There is no apology in those
words attributed to George Zimmerman. I know the difference between an apology and a statement of condolence. It
was painful hearing and reading reports giving the admitted shooter of Trayvon
Martin credit for apologizing with
those words, reiterated above.
I think the truth of my
opinion is in the dictionary, any dictionary!
One defined apology as ‘a regretful acknowledgement of an offense or failure’. Did even one of George Zimmerman’s four
sentences or the combination of all of them meet this definition of apology?
Another dictionary defined an
apology to be ‘a formal justification; defense; excuse’. Did even one of George Zimmerman’s four
sentences or the combination of all of them meet this definition of apology?
Yet here’s another definition,
‘apology- excusa’. And, yes, that was in a SPANISH
Dictionary. Did even one of George Zimmerman’s
four sentences or the combination of all of them meet this definition of apology?
And, finally, another
dictionary documents the definition of apology
as, ‘A formal expression of regret for
an offense, incivility, etc. Again,
did even one of George Zimmerman’s four sentences or the combination of all of
them meet this definition of apology?
Most importantly, there was
no acknowledgement of any deed on
Mr. Zimmerman’s part.
The words and the attention
given to what were actually words of
condolence from the admitted perpetrator – an expression of sorrow to them,
the parents of the child he has admitted he killed - had to be heart breakingly
unbearable to Trayvon Martin’s father and mother. I think their devastated response was totally
understandable.
And the media and involved
lawyers have the nerve to credit George Zimmerman with an apology!! Come on!!!!!!